Understanding Our N-Roads and the Challenge of Cost Recovery
- Red Sky Ranch POA
- Jul 26
- 2 min read
Red Sky Ranch sits in classic Apache County checkerboard country. Our roads are a mix of private parcels, Arizona State Trust land, and federal land managed by the Bureau of Land Management. The roads we grade and maintain are designated “N” roads by the County.
These N-roads are not owned by the Property Owners Association. They are public easements created for access. The County does not maintain them and does not list them on its official road inventory. They are not private roads. Because they are public easements, anyone - including State and Federal employees operating heavy equipment - may use them without seeking permission from the POA or from any individual property owner.
That open-access reality creates a practical problem. When State or Federal crews drive heavy equipment across the same roads the POA grades and repairs with member dues, the wear is real. Members reasonably ask whether the Association can recover those extra costs.

Photo by member
Here is the structured approach we are following:
Document the impact. We are beginning a simple log of agency equipment sightings (date, type of equipment, approximate number of passes, photos when safe). Without numbers we cannot assign any portion of grader time or material cost to government use.
Obtain a clear legal opinion. We will ask counsel for a short-written memo on whether Arizona law allows the POA to seek contribution from State or Federal agencies for use of public easements, and what notice or claim procedures would apply.
Explore voluntary cooperation. If the data and the legal memo support it, the Board can authorize a polite letter to the relevant State Land and BLM offices requesting a discussion of proportional cost-sharing or a simple memorandum of understanding. Many agencies already use road-maintenance agreements with counties; a similar cooperative arrangement is the only realistic path.
Report back to members. Any proposed agreement or decision not to pursue recovery will come to the Board in open session so members can see the reasoning.
The barriers, however, are significant and must be stated plainly.
There is no existing memorandum of understanding between the POA and either the State Land Department or the BLM that allocates maintenance costs. More importantly, because these are public easements, no permission is required for their use. The equitable-contribution rules that sometimes require private neighbors to share road costs do not automatically bind State or Federal agencies. Sovereign-immunity rules and the absence of any statute requiring government contribution further limit formal recovery options.
In short, forced collection is unlikely. Voluntary negotiation after careful documentation is the only low-risk route. That is the course the Board is following - transparent, measured, and grounded in the actual legal character of the roads we maintain.
We will keep members informed as the usage log and legal memo develop.
Thank you for your taking the time to understand this situation. It does matter, we are all owners. But, we are also co-owners in the complexity of the situation. I though it important to lay it all out for everyone to see.
Sincerely,
Michael Combest, President
Red Sky Ranch Property Owners Association


